Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sam Wilson's avatar

I was a member of a popular HIIT/Circuit training gym. I liked it a lot. I was in possibly the worst shape of my life when I started. I remember going there with my shirt tucked in because my shirt would slide up during certain exercises. I have NEVER been a tucked in guy. It was really good though. I liked how it catered for all ages and fitness levels. By the time I left that gym I was in close to the best shape I have ever been in to this day.

That said, It was me who did thew work. They just provided an (expensive) environment to do it in. Some weeks I was doing 11 classes per week. Which is a nod to the environment they'd created. I enjoyed it enough to go that often. These gym's are franchises though and I think I was lucky to find a franchise with a great owner (former NRL player but more importantly a fuckin' legend of a bloke) who refused to hire anyone that didn't share his same values.

Being a franchise though, it was mandatory for them to run the country wide 8, 10, 12 week challenges. I always took issue with these because I have never believed in them. I refused to do them. They would do a 'fitness test' of sorts at the start of each challenge, then do the same test at the end of the challenge. I remember I considered doing one once, but when I saw the food plan I scoffed. I was burning between 300-500 calories per class. The food plan had days where you ate only 1100 calories per day.

You don't have to be a dietitian to work out that at that intake you would lose weight without even training. What I found disturbing was the incentive of prizes for the people who lost the most weight/BF% throughout the challenge. So essentially, they were incentivising people to train more, on less fuel. Fuckin' dangerous. At the end of the challenge they would have a party, which is great. consolidate that community feeling among members, make new friends etc, all good. But, they'd have it at a pub with free booze. So essentially saying you are allowed to have a massive blow out after working hard for an extended period of time. Whilst I agree people deserved to let their hair down after such a challenge, I don't think it's the right message to send.

I'm not an expert by any stretch, but from my lived experience I've formed the view that long term, sustainable results, come from a long term, sustainable approach. Fad diets and challenges might give someone the kick start they need, but they sell a lie.

So, why don't they have a challenge to kick start people then a transition period where the guide people back to a more long term and sustainable approach? Easy, because then you no longer have a need for them. How can you sell something to someone when you've already sold them everything you have?

I would love to see a world where the fitness industry told people the truth, "you will put some weight back on after this challenge, however, this will be a great kick start for you to then move into a more sustainable lifestyle where you just burn more than you consume over a 7 day period".

The modern world is riddled with greed and honestly, I don't think we will ever see it revert. Dog eat dog type shit.

I think the key is to use our logical brains when considering things like this. "Will someone get a financial gain from me doing this?". If the answer is yes, that needs to be front of mind when considering things like this.

Never take nutrition advice from a personal trainer, especially one from the internet.

Expand full comment
Binh's avatar

Benny - You are definitely not disliked by me!

You make some very strong and valid comments. For me - my biggest investment in myself has been the psychological investment. The complete shift in mindset while easy to say, harder to do.

I love your work. Keep being you.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts